anonymous
  • anonymous
The potential energy was directed proportional to the height. The kinetic energy was depended on the potential energy quantity. This method could be used to have an equivalent point and prevented the ball from falling. Please help does this paragraph make any sense???
English
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
i can try to hep you but i am not oringnally english itlian i am so please dont get mad of i can't help ok>?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Your paragraph makes sense although it lacks smoothness let alone unity in structure. Try this instead: The potential energy was directly proportional to the height values. On the other hand, the kinetic energy was dependent on that same potential energy. This relationship can be used to find an equivalent point from a Cartesian grid, enabling us to prevent the ball from falling.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thank you sooo much

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.