At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
how do u do this?
what kind of math is this
Lol, what is that "and" doing there
so it -3=1 3/5 + M
I never learned this sadly so I put it in the chat for you!
do u turn it into an improper fraction
the choices are
that would help
@benlindquist In the original problem, was the "and" in there -3 = 1 and 3/5 + m It seems out of place...
(-2 3/5) (-4 3/5) (-4 2/5) (-1 2/5)
@ShadowLegendX he's basically say -3=1 3/5 + M thats all
the 3/5 is above the 1
1 to the 3/5 power?
i do not know
Can you take a screenshot of the problem? A lot of confusion is being caused
If you donʻt know how to take a screenshot on your computer. Google "LightShot" Itʻs a screenshot tool that is extremely easy to use, and itʻs used very widely on this site
Or, if itʻs an image. You can also download it, and click the "Attach File" button, next to the "Equation" and "Draw" button, and put the file there where we can view it.
I'm getting it hold on
there we go
is that something different
m = -4, but thatʻs not one of your answers
-4^(3/5) makes no sense, as you would simplify at 1^(3/5) to 1. Then just add from there...
is it -4 and 3/5
No, itʻs the closest thing to what the answer would be tho
ill try it
I donʻt know, @Owlcoffee could probably shed some light where I am ignorant
Sigh, just go with it I guess, let me know if it was correct or not
"X is at least 2" can be represented by x > 2. false
Did you get it right or wrong
I'm still on the same page
I am a little confused about all this honestly, what is the issue?