bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
Help!! Explain why the two figures below are not similar.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
1 Attachment
leonardo0430
  • leonardo0430
you will want to start off first by stating the coordinates of both shapes
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
ok

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

leonardo0430
  • leonardo0430
now after you had plotted the coordinates you will notice that the original shape (the one in the right) has doubled its size. since it has grown all of the points will be multiplied by two. but as you can see MN is supposed to be FG, but it has not doubled in size
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
I don't get it. How has it doubled in size by plotting the coordinates?
leonardo0430
  • leonardo0430
let me show you , the distance between J and K are two boxes, since the shape has doubled its size this means that the distance will be doubled. the distance between C and D are now 4 boxes ( distance has been doubled)
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
oh ok
anonymous
  • anonymous
LEO
leonardo0430
  • leonardo0430
but if you take alook at M and N the distance is by 1 box, while in the other shape F and G are still by 1 box, while they should be between 2 boxes
anonymous
  • anonymous
if you look at n to m on the little picture it goes up the same as the big picture, if it were similar it would only go up 1/2 a square
leonardo0430
  • leonardo0430
yes @I_luv_Sparkles ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
does that help?
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
i get it, but how are they not similar. Are they congruent (the same)?
anonymous
  • anonymous
and if you look from I to J then from B to C it's a different slope so it can't be similar, so they are not congruent
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
ok
anonymous
  • anonymous
no relation
anonymous
  • anonymous
does that help
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
ok. Yep it helps a lot thank you!
anonymous
  • anonymous
no problem
leonardo0430
  • leonardo0430
if they were to be similar this is how it would look like
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
May you please give me a medal? if not that's fine
leonardo0430
  • leonardo0430
ill give you one
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
I'm sorry @Jlykins I gave the medal to @leonardo0430 because @leonardo0430 was the first to help me. :'(
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok, thnx
anonymous
  • anonymous
hope i was a big help
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
You were i wish i could give more than one medal :'(
anonymous
  • anonymous
it's fine
anonymous
  • anonymous
i
bunnielover948
  • bunnielover948
What?????

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.