You are a judge that is trying a murder case. Up until this point there has been only one suspect (Suspect A), but new evidence and information show that more than one person was involved in the murder. The evidence shows that this second suspect (Suspect B) may have been the one to pull the trigger and commit the heinous crime of murder. How does this new evidence affect Suspect A?
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect B.
The new evidence is considered aggravating circumstances and may increase the blameworthiness of the Suspect A.
The new evidence is considered aggravating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of Suspect A.
The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect A.
The fourth one. The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect A. This is because mitigating circumstances only reduce the severity of the crime.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
can you help me with this one
In July of 2004, Sherelee Purnell of Salisbury, Maryland, pulled away from the Tiger Mart gas station without paying for the 2.78 gallons of fuel she pumped into her car. The court decided to give her a(n) _________________ sentence where she was ordered to walk along the street in front of the Tiger Mart gas station wearing a sign that declared the crime she committed.
No problem. Aggravating circumstances are the opposite where the severity of the crime is increased due to their factors. This might be assault with a weapon.
yeah, could you help with that one ? These are the choices indeterminate
Yes just one second.
It would be alternate.
No problem. Alternate sentence basically means consequences that is not prison.
oh okay lol
Do you know what constitutional sentencing is ?
Are there answer choices?
no this is the question , Julia has served one year of her 10-year sentence in prison. She has behaved herself, works at the library, and has not acted out in any way. She is hoping that at her next hearing the judge will reduce her sentence. What type of sentence is Julia hoping the judge will grant her?
and the choices are
Yes it is constitutional sentencing as the other ones do not make sense.
That's what i thought. Just wanted to make sure. Thank youu